The Truth About King Arthur

In our book The Serpent Grail, we had initiallythemselves. The Romans had also been powerful
explored the Arthurian legends to see what light theyenough to keep these settlements under control, and
could shed on the link between the Grail and thehad more incentives to offer them in exchange for
serpent. But we decided we should now spare thetheir loyalty, whereas Vortigern had no other choice.
time to take a brief look at the history of Britain andWord had reached him that the Picts and Scots were
the period in which Arthur supposedly lived. Mostmassing on the borders, and he simply did not have
historians place this period in the fifth century AD,the power to repel them. His tactic was Roman: bring
and so this is where we began our historical journeyin other Barbarians and get them to fight each other.
to find the ‘real Arthur’.It seems, however, that rather than settling warrior
In about 402 AD, Stilicho, the Vandal Regent ofBarbarians on his coastlines in order to protect Britain,
Rome, needed the remainder of his troops back inVortigern opened the floodgates to the land-hungry
Rome to defend the homeland against the invadingSaxons. Vortigern was defeated by Hengist in 455,
Goths. This left Britain militarily vulnerable and weak,the lowlands were put to the fire and the Britons fled
and by 410 the Anglo-Saxons were mounting athe country, heading for Spain and Armorica. The
terrible invasion that set the countryside alight. Buteconomy collapsed, and by 461 Vortigern the Great
why did the Saxons delay their invasion? The answerwas dead.
lies within the extremely clever way the Romans hadThere was a recovery of British fortunes a decade
previously cleared the country of what they calledor so later, when Ambrosius Aurelianus, thought to
‘barbarians’ — i.e. those people whobe the son of a Roman consul, fought against the
would have either utilized inside intelligence to assistSaxons. On Marlborough Downs in Wiltshire there is a
any invading force or who would have underminedhuge earthwork, built by a British chieftain between
the existing rule.2900—2500 BC and later used by the Romans
‘Britain was near to death until Stilicho arrived, andand Saxons. Archaeological evidence of battles from
that with the Saxons defeated, the seas were saferthis period on this re-used fort clearly show evidence
and the Picts were broken, thereby making Britainthat the Saxons were being repulsed.
secure.’ So wrote the early Christian poet andIt was then the turn of Arthur, who upheld the pride
historian, Claudian, in 399 AD. Even the Welsh monkof the British nation through various documented
Gildas (c.504—570) described how ‘thebattles. Many historians state that the true Arthur is
legions came into close contact with the cruelelusive in the texts of the time, but there are
enemies and slew great numbers of them. All ofhundreds of Welsh texts that refer to Arthur and
them were driven beyond the borders and thewhich have not yet been translated into English. Not
humiliated natives rescued from the bloody savagerybeing Welsh scholars, we unfortunately have to leave
which awaited them.’[i]this task to them, but we should remember that
For eight years then, between the Romans leavingthere is more yet to learn.
and the Saxons invading, it appears that BritainThis history of the fifth-century Britons is interesting,
enjoyed a brief time of relevant peace. This peacebut only partially of interest in our search for the
was shattered violently as the Saxons instigated theirGrail. The Romans had brought the Scythians to
bloody onslaught in the summer of 410. By winter,Britain; they also brought with them their cultural
the British ‘civitates’ had simply had enoughbelief systems. They fought well, and in all probability,
of their Roman pretender, Constantine III, and theaided the Britons with training in their warrior ways.
old Roman system, and so they decided to go itThe memory of these cultural additions seeped into
alone. However, the British message to the Emperorthe British consciousness and became British, Celtic,
Honorius left open a small in-road just in case theyand eventually ‘New Age’. This very real
were making a mistake. Britain wanted to stay in thestruggle for power and for the defence of the realm
Roman Empire, not as subjects but as allies aidingwas an ideal backdrop to the mystery that is now
each other with trade and defence. So Britaincalled the ‘Arthurian cycle’.
became an autonomous state within the Empire,There probably was an Ambrosius, an Arthur and a
especially after the sacking of Rome byVortigern, and they doubtless fought great battles
Alaric’s Goths in 410.and overcame terrible troubles. But would they have
This balance of power continued, and in 417 AD theunderstood the idea of the Grail as the ‘serpent
units of Comes Brittaniarum partially reoccupied thepeople’ would have understood it? We doubt
Saxon forts along the south-east coast. This Britishit. Of course, they would have been familiar with
force comprised six units of cavalry and three ofstories of a legendary ‘magical substance’
infantry, a unique mobile field army whose method ofthat could help soldiers recover, heal battle wounds,
fighting was influenced by the Scythianand ‘resurrect’ them in great numbers. This
warrior-élite who had been brought to Britain byunderstanding would have come from what they had
the Romans. These Scythians also brought many ofpicked up from the myths which had been encoded
the serpent related traditions we have foundwith the wisdom of the shamanic ‘serpent
associated with Arthur — including the worshippeople’, otherwise known as the Shining Ones.
of Uther/Zeus and the plunging of the blood soakedThis magical substance was ‘mixed’ in the
sword into and out of the ground as an offering.sacred mixing-bowl, and Britain in the fifth century
Following the death of Honorius, Rome sufferedwas itself a great and wondrous
badly at the hands of usurpers and the final remnants‘mixing-bowl’. Cultures from across the
of the Roman army vanished from Britain. The exactknown world travelled to it. Exports of British copper,
date of their departure is not known, althoughlead, tin, and much more were shipped across Europe
Nennius, the eighth-century Christian historian, tells usand the Mediterranean. There is even evidence that
that Vortigern had become King of Britain by 425 AD.the ancient Egyptians visited our shores and that a
This probably referred to the southern regions andPharaoh’s daughter may well have settled in
those parts of Britain previously held by the Romans.Ireland. Folklore tradition also tells us that Joseph of
Vortigern, it seems, filled the gaping hole that RomeArimathea visited these shores, and owned tin mines
left behind.in Cornwall — although this we seriously doubt.
Whether there is any truth in it or not, the HistoriaIf traditions such as these are far from truth, we
Brittonium states that it was Vortigern who invitedhave to ask ourselves, why were these strange
Hengist and Horsa, the Norse warriors, to settle intales invented?
Kent, only to later argue and fight against them. TheIf, as it seems, Britain was an important place, or
old system of Roman rule finally began to crumble.even just as important as say Gaul, then why could
Vortigern’s answer was to invite yet moreBritain not also be the new home to the secret of
foreigners to settle in the country, creating for themthe Grail? As we have shown in The Serpent Grail,
settlements called foederati. Was this wise council onthe Grail on the ‘first level’ or venom, is
Vortigern’s part? It may just have been hisnot place specific. It is a secret held by all the
only answer, and a Roman answer at that, for thecivilizations of the globe, called many things, but
Romans had utilized this settlement procedureessentially the same substance.